The day in three parts. Nothing here explains itself twice — read each on its own, or watch what carries between them.
Nothing in the record proves these three filings spoke to one another — only that they were filed as if they had already agreed to.
The file does not resolve whether custody was ever truly held, only that it was, without exception, passed on.
The clause does not ask to be believed. It only asks to be filed alongside everything else that failed to hold, on the same day, for reasons that were never really separate.